Content
The draft bill has been referred to the State Economics Legislation Committee, who released a report on 10 May 2024 recommending that the Bill be passed. As crypto asset sales may involve an offer of financial products, this has marketing implications. Such a disclosure document must set out prescribed information, including benefits and risks of the product, as well as the provider’s fee structure, to assist a client in deciding whether to acquire the crypto asset from the provider. In some instances, the marketing activity itself may cause the sale to be an offer of a regulated financial product. Entities dealing in financial product https://www.xcritical.com/ crypto assets will need to comply with the regulatory requirements under the Corporations Act, which generally include disclosure, registration, licensing and conduct obligations. An entity that facilitates payments by crypto assets may also be required to hold an AFSL and the operator of a crypto asset exchange may be required to hold an Australian market licence if the supported assets are financial products.
The Payments Newsletter including Digital Assets & Blockchain, September 2024
Crypto assets may also be vulnerable to cyberattacks, system failures, or human errors, which may compromise the security and integrity of the crypto assets and the underlying platforms. The crypto assets sector has experienced phenomenal growth in the past few years, globally and in blockchain payments the UK. According to a recent report, the global crypto assets market capitalisation reached $2.6 trillion in May 2021, up from $193 billion in January 2020.
Regulatory complexity and fragmentation
NFTs are a type of crypto assets that represent unique and indivisible digital assets, such as art, music, games, collectibles or identity. NFTs use DLT to verify the ownership, provenance and authenticity of the digital assets, and to enable their creation, transfer and monetisation. NFTs have emerged as a new and exciting phenomenon in the market, as they enable the digitalisation and democratisation of the creative economy, and create new opportunities and challenges for artists, creators and consumers. Digital asset According to a report, the total sales volume of NFTs reached $10.7 billion in the third quarter of 2021, up from $1.3 billion in the second quarter of 2021.
What is regulation for cryptocurrency?
It can be seen that the key to judging whether a property can become a thing stipulated by the “Property Law” lies in whether it can be controlled by people, rather than being judged from its physical manifestation. Does cryptocurrency have the nature of creditor’s rights, that is, can holders of cryptocurrency enjoy creditor rights because they hold cryptocurrency? Ordinary network virtual currency such as QQ coin is a centralized commodity, which is issued by network operators of central institutions such as Tencent company. Therefore, network virtual currency has the dual attributes of property rights and creditor’s rights. Network virtual currency holders have real rights to the human body other than the network operator, and they can exclusively control the network virtual currency.
Capital markets products are defined under the SFA as securities, units in a collective investment scheme, derivatives contracts and spot foreign exchange contracts for leveraged foreign exchange trading and other products prescribed by the MAS. A U.S. CBDC – a digital form of the U.S. dollar – has the potential to offer significant benefits. It could enable a payment system that is more efficient, provides a foundation for further technological innovation, facilitates faster cross-border transactions, and is environmentally sustainable. It could promote financial inclusion and equity by enabling access for a broad set of consumers. In addition, it could foster economic growth and stability, protect against cyber and operational risks, safeguard the privacy of sensitive data, and minimize risks of illicit financial transactions. CBDC could also help preserve U.S. global financial leadership, and support the effectiveness of sanctions.
The EU unveiled its proposed framework, The Markets in Crypto-Assets Act, called both ‘MiCA’ and ‘MiCAR’ for short, back in September 2020. In under three years, the details of the new regulation were largely agreed upon, and in April 2023, the European Parliament approved the act. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) bans crypto enterprises from operating in the country, stating that they facilitate public financing without approval. • Personal rights, which arise from a person (such as personal image or privacy rights) or unilateral acts of the person (for example, the creation of a work of art giving rise to copyright).
However, cryptocurrency transactions can easily break through the existing regulatory system of such centralized institutions. Nakamoto (2008) proposed a new electronic payment system based on cryptographic principles instead of credit currencies, by which the peer-to-peer electronic cash system enables any two parties to reach an agreement. Based on a distributed ledger, Bitcoin provides a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network (Patgiri, Acharjamayum, and Devi 2019). The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing. It can be exchanged for traditional currency or buy goods or services, usually through online transactions.
Private law rights, with some exceptions and unless the violation thereof threatens public order, are generally not enforced through the criminal justice system, nor are they enforced by government regulators. Instead, the civil justice system is made available by governments for private parties to enforce their private rights themselves. Certain personal rights may be enforced through both systems; however, these are not explored in this paper.
How to make clearer legal qualifications to regulate the operation of China’s cryptocurrency can be learned from international experience in this regard. By adopting distributed ledger-based technology, which is different from traditional financial products, the financial market can strengthen investor protection and improve the efficiency of risk management. The change in the technology paradigm with the introduction of DLT systems for securities and derivatives FMI can increase investor control, and the efficiency of risk management, and, to some extent, augment the distribution of systemic risk (Avgouleas and Kiayias 2019). The cryptocurrency industry is rife with conflicts of interest that harm investors and reduce competition. In one example, crypto company Terraform Labs created a token, Luna, and also created a lending platform, Anchor, that promised 20 percent interest to customers who invested in Luna on Anchor.
- The CFPB has policies — such as the No Action Letter (NAL) policy — that perform many of the functions of a sandbox.
- There is a general obligation that entities relying on technology in connection with the provision of a regulated service must have the necessary organisational competence and adequate technological resources and risk management plans in place.
- Additionally, due to inadequate cybersecurity measures, many crypto brokers and marketplaces have lost billions of dollars of customers’ crypto assets.
- Notably, the Corporations Act may apply to crypto asset sales regardless of whether they are created and offered from Australia or overseas.
The public-private law distinction may initially appear to have transferred into the blockchain world in the categories of tokens acknowledged by financial industry regulators; however, this impression is not entirely accurate. Security tokens and cryptocurrencies represent only very narrow fields of the public law rights domain, while utility tokens represent an even narrower aspect of the private law rights domain, respectively. The notice of the central bank only stipulates that Bitcoin does not have the same status as currency and should not be used as currency in the market. Still, it does not mean that the law does not protect Bitcoin, and it should even be deemed illegal by the negative evaluation of the law.
The UK is seeking to develop a comprehensive and proportionate regulatory framework for crypto assets, aiming to foster innovation, competition and consumer protection. Therefore, clients and lawyers need to be aware and prepared for the current and future developments and trends in the sector, and to overcome the potential hurdles and difficulties that they may face when engaging in crypto assets activities in the UK. Although the UK has no specific cryptocurrency laws, cryptocurrencies are not considered legal tender and exchanges have registration requirements.
The European public sector is building its own blockchain services infrastructure, which should soon be interoperable with private sector platforms. The European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Commission services are jointly reviewing at a broad range of policy, legal and technical questions relating to the possible introduction of a digital Euro. They are considering this in the context of their respective mandates and independence provided for in the Treaties. In addition to the aforementioned international organizations, many countries have begun to regulate emerging cryptocurrencies through their domestic administrative, legislative, and judicial systems (Alvarez 2018). According to a research report released by the blockchain security company CipherTrace, by the end of July 2021, major crypto thefts, hacks, and frauds totaled $681 million (CipherTrace 2021). It is precisely because of the existence of these problems that supervision has become the inevitable choice of governments.
Crypto assets are digital representations of value or contractual rights that use cryptography and distributed ledger technology (DLT) to enable peer-to-peer transactions without intermediaries. Crypto assets can take various forms, such as cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, utility tokens, security tokens and e-money tokens. Japan remains a friendly environment for cryptocurrencies but growing AML concerns are drawing the FSA’s attention towards further regulation.
Issuers of asset-referenced tokens are also subject to own funds requirements, which should be proportionate to the issuance size of the asset-referenced tokens. They should constitute and maintain a reserve of assets matching the risks reflected in such liability and set up an adequate custody policy which shall ensure that the reserve assets are fully segregated from the issuer’s own assets at all times. Issuers of asset-referenced tokens should have robust governance arrangements, including a clear organisational structure with well-defined, transparent and consistent lines of responsibility and effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report the risks to which they might be exposed. The members of the management body of issuers should be fit and proper and the shareholders or members that have qualifying holdings in such issuers should be of sufficiently good repute. Issuers of asset-referenced tokens should establish a business continuity policy that aims to ensure, in the case of an interruption to their systems and procedures, the performance of their core activities related to the asset-referenced tokens. They should also have strong internal control mechanisms and effective procedures for risk management, as well as a system that guarantees the integrity and confidentiality of information received.
At the time of writing, there are no explicit restrictions on investment managers owning cryptocurrencies for investment purposes. However, investment managers may be subject to the AFSL regime where the cryptocurrencies held are deemed to be “financial products” and the investment managers’ activities in relation to those cryptocurrencies are deemed to be the provision of financial services. Marketing financial product crypto assets to Australian residents from offshore may still trigger licensing and disclosure requirements. These are permitted in Australia under the Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) (ETA) and the equivalent Australian state and territory legislation.